Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
US v. Matthew Blair
as 23-6971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW EDWARD BLAIR
Henry v. USA
as 3:2023cv00559
Petitioner:
Dustin Blair Henry
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Vaughan v. Bowers, et al
as 3:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Dominique Trent Vaughan
Defendant:
Col. Bowers, Captain Dupree and Captain Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddin Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
William Smith, Colonel E. Bowes, Captain L. Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bower et al
as 2:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Eugene Johnson, III
Defendant:
Ernest Bower, Tanya Blair, Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Lanham et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Patrick Allen Miller
Defendant:
Kelly Lanham, Blaire Watkins and Prime Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Lanham et al
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Patrick Miller
Defendant:
Superintendent Kelly Lanham and Ofc. Blair Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blair v. USA-2255
as 1:2023cv00227
Petitioner:
Matthew Blair
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
