Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Crutchfield v. Artrip et al
as 7:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Marell Tyrone Crutchfield
Defendant:
Warden Jeffery Artrip and Unknown Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey
as 22-6696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER-CRUTCHFIELD and others
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2020cv01335
Defendant:
Sarah Harper-Crutchfield, Timothy Register, William Eddins and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Baltimore City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv01332
Defendant:
Detective Mark L. Tomlin, Detective Michael Crutchfield, Judge Kathleen Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FORDHAM v. OXENDINE et al
as 1:2018cv00310
Plaintiff:
CHRIS FORDHAM
Defendant:
OXENDINE, GARY CRUTCHFIELD, ANTHONY CROMARTIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Perry et al
as 5:2017ct03119
Plaintiff:
Thomas T. Dillard, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Perry, W. David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchfield v. USA
as 1:2016cv00656
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eric Donnell Crutchfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DeVinche Albritton v. Edward Wright
as 15-8041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD WRIGHT, Warden of Lawrenceville Correctional Center, MR. MORGAN, Former Unit Manager of 30 building, MS. BACON, Former counselor of 30 building and others
Jorge Gevara v. F. Hubbard
as 15-7523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE GEVARA
Defendant - Appellee:
F. B. HUBBARD, Superintendent, CRUTCHFIELD, Assist. Superintendent of Programs, DEBRA DUNCAN, R.N. - Medical Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
