Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Bussie v. Gates et al
as 5:2017hc02208
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Unknown Internet Service Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Latron Brown v. Dell Johnson
as 17-7490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATRON DUPREE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALBEMARLE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN MCKAY, TAVIS COFFIN and others
Tyler v. Clark, Director VDOC
as 2:2017cv00347
Petitioner:
O'Dell Cornelius Tyler
Respondent:
Harold Clark, Director VDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Latron Brown v. Dell Johnson
as 16-7110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATRON DUPREE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DELL JOHNSON, JOHN MCKAY, TAVIS COFFIN and others
Defendant:
ALBEMARLE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Bradley v. Berkley County Detention Center
as 0:2016cv01200
Plaintiff:
Lee Dell Bradley
Defendant:
Berkley County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Ervin et al
as 0:2016cv00742
Plaintiff:
Dell Layfette Carter
Defendant:
Rayford Ervin, Frank Sadler, Gary Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. Warden
as 1:2015cv02873
Petitioner:
Brian O'Dell Walters
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Rutherford v. Dale Ander
as 15-6199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RUTHERFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
CORPORAL DALE ANDERS, SERGEANT MELINDA HANEY, a/k/a Sergeant Belinda and PFC DAVID EAVES
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY JAIL, ROBERT HINES, Administrator, D. HANEY, Assistant Administrator and others
Dell Carter v. Rayford Ervin
as 14-7062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELL LAYFETTE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYFORD ERVIN, Clover Police Dept., FRANK SADLER, Clover Police Dept., GARY LOVE, Clover Police Dept. and others
O'Dell v. Plumley
as 1:2014cv00073
Petitioner:
Timothy O'Dell
Respondent:
Marvin Plumley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
