Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Dianne Maros v. Ashley Cure
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
DIANNE M. MAROS
Defendant:
ASHLEY ELIZABETH CURE, GREENVILLE COUNTY and GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Louis v. Stirling
as 1:2024cv01320
Plaintiff:
Darryl Keith Louis, Jr. and Saddiq
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Edward Bittinger and Dianne Stubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bottino v. Howard County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Dianne Bottino
Defendant:
Howard County, Maryland, Warden/Director Margaret M. Chippendale, Warden/Director Jama Acuff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Tyler v. James Hudson
as 23-6794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY JAMES TYLER, a/k/a Larry James Tyler, #354459
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HUDSON, Sheriff and DIANN WILKS
Larry Tyler v. James Hudson
as 23-6374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY JAMES TYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HUDSON, Sheriff and DIANN WILKS
Ziglar v. Skiles et al
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Ziglar
Defendant:
Diann Skiles, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Tyler v. James Hudson
as 22-7437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY JAMES TYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HUDSON, Sheriff and DIANN WILKS
Tyler v. Hudson et al
as 9:2022cv01544
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler and Larry James Tyler,
Defendant:
James Hudson and Diann Wilks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tyler v. Hudson et al
as 9:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Defendant:
James Hudson, Diann Wilks and Dr. John Trogoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
