Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Morgan v. USA
as 5:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Dorian Michael Morgan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ricky Butler v. Nurse Hryn
as 22-7469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE HRYN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAW, JR. and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL, NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD, SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull and others
Ricky Butler v. Edward Hull
as 22-6903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull, NURSE HRYN, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL and NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD
Johnson v. Streeval
as 7:2020cv00519
Petitioner:
Dorian Johnson
Respondent:
Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Beasley (Dorian) v. Mozingo
as 8:2020cv00387
Defendant:
C. Mozingo
Plaintiff:
Lamont Beasley (Dorian)
Interested Party:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Straughter v. South Central Regional Jail
as 2:2019cv00338
Plaintiff:
Dorian Straughter
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoover et al v. South Central Regional Jail
as 2:2018cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Camp, Joseph Lobuts, III, Harvey Johnson and others
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv00416
Plaintiff:
Carmen Johnson
Defendant:
David Wilson, Jerrod Grimes, Barbara Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jamerson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv02310
Petitioner:
Dorian Jamerson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Young v. Peumansend Creek Regional Jail
as 1:2015cv00264
Defendant:
Peumansend Creek Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Dorian D. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
