Cases 1 - 10 of 327
Freeman v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Precias Freeman
Respondent:
Christi Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Freeman v. Ray
as 3:2024cv00080
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Petitioner:
Ronald Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nedd v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00533
Defendant:
Sargent Lewis, Wallens Ridge State Prison and Correctional Officer Freeman
Plaintiff:
Aariq M. Nedd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00669
Petitioner:
KEVIN ANTHONY FREEMAN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Albert Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution
as 24-6557
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2, Correctional Officers, REEP, Warden, HUDGINS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Dwayne Freeman v. Sergeant Kim
as 24-1539
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. FREEMAN
Defendant:
SERGEANT KIM, The Acting Lieutenant; Jailor Sergeant, SERGEANT LAURA, Jailor Sergeant and LIEUTENANT KNIGHT, Lieutenant Jailor
Murdock v. Hensley et al
as 5:2024cv00169
Defendant:
FNU Gest, FNU Hensley, FNU Baers and others
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku Murdock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Marshall et al
as 1:2024cv01116
Defendant:
Ofc. Bowens, Ofc. Sage, Ofc. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Hunter Dixon
Defendant:
J. Artrip, Wallens Ridge State Prison, Correctional Officer Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raynor v. Bertie County et al
as 5:2024ct03142
Plaintiff:
Jaronta Javar Raynor
Defendant:
Mr. Whitehurst, Bertie County and L. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
