Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Finch v. Kilgore et al
as 7:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Matthew Finch
Defendant:
Major Kilgore, Todd Tatum, Lt. Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Trentzch et al
as 1:2022cv01926
Plaintiff:
Sharon-Shawn A. Bell
Defendant:
Johnathan Trentzch, Jeffrey Hartman, Lt. Rosay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Finch v. C/O Mayo
as 1:2021cv01014
Plaintiff:
Edward Finch
Defendant:
C/O Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe-5 v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services et al
as 1:2021cv00398
Defendant:
George Willie Yeldell, Jerry B Adger, Ashley Finch and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Finch v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 0:2021cv00395
Defendant:
Charles B. Wester Detention Center, Aiken County Detention Center, Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Finch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe-4 v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services et al
as 1:2021cv00355
Defendant:
George Willie Yeldell, Jerry B. Adger, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TYLER v. TROUTMAN et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Defendant:
JAMES O'NELL, JOINNER, FINCH and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniel v. Saxon et al
as 2:2018cv01939
Plaintiff:
Roymad Shaquil McDaniel
Defendant:
K-9 Magnum, Richard A Finch, Jr, Anderson City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Charles Finch v. Timothy McKoy
as 17-6518
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES RAY FINCH
Respondent - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT TIMOTHY MCKOY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
