Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Hines v. USA
as 3:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Warren Eugene Hines, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hines v. USA
as 3:2023cv00669
Petitioner:
Warren Eugene Hines, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hines v. Lexington County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv04828
Plaintiff:
Dyshawn Hines
Defendant:
Lexington County Detention Center, LT Felder and Officer Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines v. USA
as 3:2023cv00421
Petitioner:
Warren Eugene Hines, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hines v. Leu
as 2:2023cv00075
Petitioner:
Anthony Hines
Respondent:
D. Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Garry Hines
as 22-7453
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GARRY HINES
Dwayne Hines v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7001
Petitioner / Appellant:
DWAYNE DOMINIC HINES
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Messer v. Maury Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2022ct03253
Plaintiff:
Matthew Douglas Messer
Defendant:
Maury Correctional Institution, Mark Flemming, John Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aurel v. North Branch Correctional Institution Officer's Mail Room et al
as 1:2022cv01741
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
North Branch Correctional Institution Officer's Mail Room, Warden J. Hines and K. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
