Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Forbes v. Alvin S. Glen Det. Cent et al
as 0:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
David Forbes
Defendant:
Alvin S. Glen Det. Cent, Unknown Board Members, A.S.G.D.C. Board of Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cureton v. Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution
as 0:2022cv01179
Petitioner:
John Mark Cureton, III
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. The McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
John Mark Collins, II and Mattie Collins McGuire
Defendant:
The McDowell County Commission, Tina Blackburn, Barbara Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2016cv01292
Petitioner:
JOHN MARK RICHARDSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2016cv00398
Petitioner:
JOHN MARK RICHARDSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 0:2015cv00848
Plaintiff:
Antonio Davis
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, John Mark Shiflet, Kristin Danielle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bullard et al
as 5:2014ct03076
Plaintiff:
John Mark Jones
Defendant:
Officer Bullard, Officer Rising, Lumberton Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. John M. Richardson
as 12-6412
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN MARK RICHARDSON
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2011cv00688
Petitioner:
JOHN MARK RICHARDSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shell v. Davis et al
as 2:2011cv02025
Plaintiff:
John Mark Shell
Defendant:
Sheriff Davis, Major Smith, Lt Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
