Cases 1 - 10 of 1,034
Hightower v. Kelly
as 1:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Randy Hightower
Defendant:
Lt. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walker Washington, Jr. v. Warden Kelly
as 24-6514
Plaintiff:
WALKER WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, Individual Capacity, CAPTAIN CHASE, Individual Capacity, LIEUTENANT ALLEN, (S.E.S.) (S.I.S.), Individual Capacity and others
Tyler v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02097
Petitioner:
Branden Tyler
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KELLY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00427
Petitioner:
JAKE ROBERT KELLY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Woodard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03126
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden L.B. Kelly, Safety Supervisor Muscle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Montgomery v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02091
Petitioner:
Louvertis Kayonne Montgomery
Respondent:
Warden Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
