Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Brailford v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
Michael T. Brailford
Respondent:
State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03290
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Monica Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohler v. Halmilton
as 7:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Mohler
Defendant:
Captain Chad Halmilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Michael Rand
as 23-6731
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. RAND
CARTER v. MWAMBA et al
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
JEREMY CARTER
Defendant:
BARRY MWAMBA, SGT. MYRICK, OFC. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. Billinter et al
as 7:2022cv00642
Defendant:
Major Johnny Billinter, Johnny Billinger, Captain Patricia McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. McFarland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Braxton v. Warden of the Anderson County Detention Center
as 22-7232
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. BRAXTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ANDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Braxton v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2022cv02806
Petitioner:
Michael T Braxton and Michael Todd Braxton
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of the Anderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Braxton v. Scarborough et al
as 8:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Braxton
Defendant:
Joette Scarborough, A. Boyd, C. York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
