Cases 1 - 10 of 41
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald v. Bell et al
as 5:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
Wesley Gerald
Defendant:
APRN Natalie Bell, Dr Pfeiffer, Lt Mouzon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Davis v. Vitalcore Health Strategies et al
as 5:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Teru Davis
Defendant:
Vitalcore Health Strategies, Jason Loy and Natalie Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Banks v. Bell
as 0:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Cameron Julius Xavier Banks, Sr. and Cameron Banks
Defendant:
APRN Natalie Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Miller v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00261
Petitioner:
Natalie L. Miller
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Warden
as 5:2023hc02200
Petitioner:
Natalie L. Miller
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Rile et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Shemika Williams
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Rile, Dana Rennick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cochran v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00598
Petitioner:
Natalie P. Cochran
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. Pough et al
as 6:2022cv04451
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Smith
Defendant:
Freddie Pough, Velvet McGowan, Chenelle Okoro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Roshune Carelock v. Jeff Johnson
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSHUNE LEMARR CARELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF JOHNSON, LYNETTE PATTON, WILLIAM BARNES and others
Defendant:
TRACY BLACK, NATALIE GAMBLE, MR. CHARLES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
