Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Haynes v. Quinn et al
as 5:2024cv00125
Defendant:
FNU Starowicz, FNU Quinn, FNU Lay and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeremy Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. Mark Hayes
as 24-6248
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
MARK J. HAYES, HOPE M. BLACKLEY, GAIL MOFFITT and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Marshals
as 24-6249
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg, AGENT DILLION, 7th Judicial Parole Officer, WARDEN ROBERT MICHAEL, Stevenston, III and others
McCall v. The State
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Quinn McCall
Defendant:
The State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Crawley v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cordero Crawley
Defendant:
Rick White, Quinn Reynolds and Nicholas Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
WILLIAM QUINN DAY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Quinn v. Hayes et al
as 7:2023cv06174
Plaintiff:
Cecil Jerome Quinn, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark J Hayes, Hope M Blackley, Gail Moffitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cecil Jerome Quinn, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Marshals et al
as 8:2023cv06176
Plaintiff:
Cecil Jerome Quinn, Jr.
Defendant:
State of South Carolina Marshals, Agent Dillion, Warden Robert Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gladden v. Quinn et al
as 5:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D. Gladden
Defendant:
Joshua T. Quinn, Darren C Daves, Joshua L Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
