Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Harris v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00499
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Harris
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robert Reed v. Michael, et al.
as 23-6656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL, a/k/a Mike, U.S. Marshal, PHILLIP CORNELIOUS, D.C. Superior Court Agent, JEQUAN JACKSON, U.S. Parole Case Analyst and others
Reed v. Michael, et al. et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Defendant:
Michael, et al., Mike, Phillip Cornelious and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed, Corp Sole v. Whitmer et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed, Corp Sole doing business as Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
Chris Whitmer, Erick Helenihi, April Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Reed v. Lovett, D.B.A
as 5:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
S. Lovett, D.B.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bartlett v. Smith et al
as 5:2018ct03124
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr.
Defendant:
Paula Smith, Brad Perritt, Larry Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ndokey Enow v. Robert Green
as 17-6517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NDOKEY ENOW
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT L. GREEN, SHELFORD GILLIAM, ANTHONY MUDALUE and others
Defendant:
WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03472
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01236
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bartlett v. Perry
as 5:2015hc02014
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr.
Respondent:
Frank L. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
