Cases 1 - 10 of 1,180
Loren et al v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03225
Plaintiff:
Webster R. Neumann, Bobby Reece, Roger W. Clark and others
Defendant:
Haley Phillips, Darren Jackson, Graham Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rogers
as 4:2024cv03884
Plaintiff:
Tonya Marie Jackson
Defendant:
Solicitor William B Rogers, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02156
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
JONES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00704
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ROGER WAYNE JONES, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Peters v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2024ct03195
Defendant:
Burgaw Police Department, Lt. Rogers, Sgt. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Rene Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tracey Grady v. D. Rogers
as 24-6767
Defendant:
V. L. ADCOCK, Sgt.at Union County Jail, Individual Capacity, FNU KEZIAH, Officer at Union County Jail, Individual Capacity, EDDIE CATHEY, Sheriff of Union County and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY TERRELL GRADY
Saleh v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00294
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ms. S. Phipps, Ms. E. Stennett and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Saleh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Delvin Stafford v. Sergeant Stout
as 24-6766
Plaintiff:
DELVIN STAFFORD
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ROGERS, OFFICER LAND and SERGEANT STOUT
Ray Rogers v. Donald Wenk
as 24-6574
Plaintiff:
RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Defendant:
S. LEONARD, SHERIFF EDWARD MCMAHON, ERIC EDWARDS and others
Jerome Curry v. MacDougall Corr. Inst
as 24-6692
Defendant:
CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME CURRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
