Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Womble v. Smith et al
as 5:2024ct03078
Plaintiff:
Edward Lamont Womble
Defendant:
Domenick Smith, Lt. Renita Summers, John R. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Woodson v. Summers et al
as 7:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Summers, Ms. P. Adams, Ms. Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Dawn et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Sheldon D Summers
Defendant:
FNU Dawn, FNU Steel, FNU Carrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. OCDC et al
as 5:2023cv06945
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Defendant:
OCDC, Orangeburg County Sheriff's Dept, South Carolina Sheriff Thomas Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Summers v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Summers
Defendant:
Darren Campbell and Bert Connolly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 23-6751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
G. KELLETT, G.E.O. Inc Unit Manager/Intelligence OFC., PAUL HAYMES, Chief of Special Investigations Unit, DIRECTOR HAROLD W. CLARKE, Department of Corrections and others
Pagan v. Brogdon et al
as 3:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Lance R Pagan
Defendant:
David Brogdon, Derrick Meek, Gaston County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00452
Petitioner:
Eric Germaine Summers
Respondent:
Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
