Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Sanford v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6964
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE SANFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir.; Virginia DOC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia DOC and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia DOC
Sanford v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
James Lewis Sanford
Respondent:
United States of America and Quinton Miller
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Roderick Sanford
as 23-6807
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODERICK LAMAR SANFORD
Roderick Sanford v. US
as 22-7450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK LAMAR SANFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Warden Brian K. Dobbs)
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sanford v. United States of America
as 0:2021cv02552
Plaintiff:
Roderick Sanford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Burrell v. Hodge et al
as 1:2021cv00876
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Barrell and Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
Jessica Hodge, P. West Brook-Scott, Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Brown et al
as 5:2021ct03015
Defendant:
Case Manager Hicks, R. Wiggins, Nurse Boon and others
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Sanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
