Cases 1 - 10 of 15
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 23-6751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
G. KELLETT, G.E.O. Inc Unit Manager/Intelligence OFC., PAUL HAYMES, Chief of Special Investigations Unit, DIRECTOR HAROLD W. CLARKE, Department of Corrections and others
Segura v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02156
Petitioner:
Daniel Segura
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Segura Morales v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Jose Wellingt Segura Morales
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 20-6649
Defendant / Appellee:
D. GOODE, G. MILITANA, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DR. L. WANG, Physician, LESLIE S. GREEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03190
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Trice v. J. Segura
as 16-7545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WAYNE TRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
J. SEGURA, Nurse, Lawrenceville Correctional Center (LVCC)
US v. Juan Jimenez-Segura
as 16-7277
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN JIMENEZ-SEGURA, a/k/a Jose Antonio Jiminez-Martinez, a/k/a Julian Gomex-Lopez
Jones-El v. Wright et al
as 2:2016cv00502
Plaintiff:
Edwin Jones-El
Defendant:
Edward Wright, Chrissy Jones, Daniel Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southerland v. Wright et al
as 2:2016cv00480
Plaintiff:
Martin Southerland
Defendant:
Ed Wright, Chrissie Jones, Mark Militana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez-Segura v. USA
as 1:2016cv00805
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Jimenez-Segura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
