Cases 1 - 10 of 296
James Vaughter v. R. Vaughn
as 24-6724
Defendant:
T. ROWLEY, TARRA JOHNSON, Chief of Housing at SFCC, JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. VAUGHTER
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Defendant:
Dr. M. Clarke, Gary Jones, Lt. Adlan and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Satterfield v. Timothy Vaughn
as 24-6298
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
TIMOTHY VAUGHN
Grice v. USA
as 3:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Artemus Vaughn Grice
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Vaughan v. Warden
as 1:2023cv03038
Plaintiff:
Donald Vaughan and Donald Vaughn
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mackey v. Maryland Department of Health
as 1:2023cv02910
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mackey
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Health, Secure Evaluation & Therapeutic Treatment Center, Developmental Disabilities Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Vaughn v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00324
Petitioner:
Teddy Vaughn
Respondent:
Ms. Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vaughn v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00296
Petitioner:
Teddy Vaughn
Respondent:
Ms. Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vaughn v. South Carolina, State of
as 6:2023cv04220
Petitioner:
Earnest E Vaughn and Earnest Vaughn
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden Turbeville Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. North Charleston City Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv03863
Plaintiff:
Dominick Alexander Brown
Defendant:
North Charleston City Police Department, Detective James Walley and Judge Samantha Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
