Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Goss v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jamie Goss
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, China Wuhan Government, United State Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bailey v. Correll et al
as 0:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Donald Dean Bailey and Donald Dean Bailey, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Joseph Correll, Present Police Chief John Doe, Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Vinson v. Roane
as 5:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Adrian Vinson
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paris Funderburk v. Johnson
as 22-7141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PARIS LAQUISHA FUNDERBURK
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY JOHNSON, DEPUTY N. VINSON, DEPUTY WILLIAM BALLEW and others
Vinson v. Lyn
as 5:2021hc02117
Respondent:
Warden Lyn
Petitioner:
Wayne Vinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. Livingston et al
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant:
Jamal Vinson, Jay'Quan Cobb, Demetrius Branch and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Antionei White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funderburk v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv02903
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Facility, Deputy William Ballew, Deputy N. Vinson and others
Plaintiff:
Paris Laquisha Funderburk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINDSEY v. VAUGHAN et al
as 1:2020cv00628
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, GUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CAROLYN VAUGHAN and others
Plaintiff:
VINSON PERNELL LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leopard v. USA
as 8:2020cv01296
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Matthew Vinson Leopard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Leopard v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv01232
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Matthew Vinson Leopard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
