Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Foggie v. Wingo et al
as 8:2020cv02185
Defendant:
Jason Wells and Justin Wingo
Plaintiff:
Mareno Foggie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bane v. United States of America, The
as 2:2017cv03371
Plaintiff:
Ben W Bane
Defendant:
United States of America, The, Mr Pacheco, Adam Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Lewis et al
as 2:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Emory W Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Dwayne Lewis, Randy Demory, Captain Phyall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Wallenstein et al
as 1:2014cv03337
Plaintiff:
Pierce Harris
Defendant:
Author Wallenstein, Robert Green and Linda Wingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Green et al
as 8:2014cv02843
Plaintiff:
Pierce Harris
Defendant:
Robert Green, Aurthur Wallenstein, Linda Wingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Montgomery County Correctional Facility
as 8:2013cv02003
Plaintiff:
Kent Bell
Defendant:
Tony Sturgess and Linda Wingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wingo v. Spartanburg County Detention Center et al
as 0:2008cv01906
Plaintiff:
Mark Stephen Wingo
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center, Larry Powers, Caroline Dumphy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Wingo et al
as 7:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Trey Wingo and Pam Oliver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
