Cases 101 - 110 of 29,025
Jones v. Charleston County et al
as 6:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Nekeya Jones
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Culberson v. Doe et al
as 8:2024cv03211
Plaintiff:
David Culberson
Defendant:
John Doe, Averitt Express Inc and Dennis Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alston v. Hicks
as 0:2024cv03209
Petitioner:
Londell Lashun Alston
Respondent:
Chief John Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
HARRISON v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
YAW NYADU HARRISON
Defendant:
ZERRANTI MCLEAN, JOHN DOE, MR. NEU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Pathward, N.A.
as 3:2024cv03199
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, (II)
Defendant:
Pathward, N.A., Routing # = 073972181
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. J.G. Wentworth et al
as 3:2024cv03207
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, (II)
Defendant:
J.G. Wentworth, R.C. Henderson Trust a/k/a R.C. Henderson, Trust Subsidiary of Def. No. 2 and Securian Financial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
