Cases 111 - 120 of 535
Amos v. City Of Chesapeake et al
as 2:2020cv00158
Defendant:
Southeastern Cooperative Educational Programs, Tidewater Regional Alternative Educational Program, Kimberly M Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Brooke C Amos and B. C. A., a minor, by her mother and best friend Donna Amos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Best v. USA
as 2:2020cv00138
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michelle Renee Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Best v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Village of Ellenville et al
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Ulstar County and Village of Ellenville
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew High v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 20-1150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HATTIE TUCKER, RAQUAN SCARBOROUGH, LILLIE WAYMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA BATTS, SETH WALSTON, JR., DON WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
Devone Best v. Justin Andrews
as 20-6102
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVONE SHARNELL BEST
Respondent / Appellee:
JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden
W. S. v. Cassandra Daniels
as 19-2376
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CASSANDRA DANIELS and URSULA BEST
Plaintiff / Appellant:
W.S.
Corbett v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019ct03361
Defendant:
Officer Holmes, Mr. Ballard, Sgt. Brounson and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W. S. v. Cassandra Daniels
as 19-2350
Plaintiff / Appellee:
W. S. and W.S.
Defendant / Appellant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CASSANDRA DANIELS and URSULA BEST
W. S. v. Cassandra Daniels
as 19-2349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
W. S. and W.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
URSULA BEST, CASSANDRA DANIELS and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Defendant:
DR CLARK JERNIGAN, MALINDA L. ROBINSON, DON KISER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
