Cases 121 - 130 of 4,585
Robinson v. Beane et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Martin Riley Robinson
Defendant:
Honorable Judge John D. Beane, Russ Skogstad, Talia Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ruth Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCNEILL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
MARCUS MCNEILL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Hammer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02623
Defendant:
3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Hammer, James Barnes, J Kim Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Twichell v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Twichell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Green v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Brandi M. Green
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
G. B. et al v. Wood County Board of Education et al
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
G. B., C.T., M.T. and others
Defendant:
Wood County Board of Education and Tena Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cross et al v. Didehvar et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cross and Julie Cross
Defendant:
Deborah Didehvar, Benny Martin, PNC Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
