Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Miller v. Castelloe et al
as 5:2014ct03035
Plaintiff:
David Henry Miller
Defendant:
Superintendent Castelloe, Theresa Gillette, Mr. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castello v. Mims et al
as 4:2013cv01798
Plaintiff:
Claudia Gomez Castello
Defendant:
Olanta, The Town of and Mathew Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Davis v. Rodney William
as 13-6582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENCLEY DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TOMMY CASTELLOE, WALLACE W. DIXON, SANDRA WALLACE-SMITH and others
Joseph Michael Griffith v. D. Clark
as 13-6049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH MICHAEL GRIFFITH
Defendant - Appellee:
D. CLARK, OFFICER WHIDPEE, CAPTAIN CASTELLO and others
Santova Logistics, Ltd. v. Castello 1935 Inc.
as 6:2012cv00007
Defendant:
Castello 1935 Inc.
Plaintiff:
Santova Logistics, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Griffith v. Clark et al
as 5:2011ct03209
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Griffith
Defendant:
D. Clark, Whidpee, Castello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Davis, Jr. v. Tommy Castelloe
as 11-6773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENCELY DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY CASTELLOE, WALLACE W. DIXON, SANDRA WALLACE-SMITH and others
Davis v. Castelloe et al
as 5:2010ct03102
Plaintiff:
William Hencley Davis
Defendant:
Tommy Castelloe, Wallace W. Dixon, Sandra Wallace-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Castelloe et al
as 5:2009ct03169
Plaintiff:
William Hencley Davis
Defendant:
Tommy Castelloe, Wallace W. Dixon, Sandra Wallace-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Riches v. Oscar Ronda
as 08-7435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, ISRAEL GONZALEZ and ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant - Appellee:
OSCAR RONDA and JORGE CASTELLO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
