Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Richardson et al v. B W Mitchum Trucking Co Inc
as 2:2015cv04952
Plaintiff:
Graylin Richardson and Shirley A Richardson
Defendant:
B W Mitchum Trucking Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newman v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2015cv03106
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Newman
Defendant:
State of Maryland , Baltimore County, Maryland , J. Amador, #4611 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Camden v. Greenville, City of et al
as 6:2014cv04554
Plaintiff:
Steven Blair Camden
Defendant:
Greenville, City of, Greenville Police Department, Officer Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Games-Neely et al
as 3:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Games-Neely, B. W. Bean and J. D. Schuessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Games-Neely et al
as 1:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Games - Neely, B. W. Bean, J. D. Schuessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Barrat et al
as 3:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Games - Neely, B. W. Bean, J. D. Schuessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Spell v. B. W. Jone
as 13-7350
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY TYRONE SPELL
Respondent - Appellee:
B. W. JONES, Norfolk Police Department, Norfolk City Jail
Spell v. Jones
as 1:2013cv00966
Petitioner:
Jeremy Tyrone Spell
Respondent:
B. W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spell v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv00876
Plaintiff:
Jeremy T. Spell
Defendant:
B. W. Jones and B. Emerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
