Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Victor Andrade Meza v. Merrick Garland
as 22-2208
Petitioner:
VICTOR RAMO ANDRADE MEZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Martinez-Morales et al
as 5:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz Martinez-Morales, Margarito De La Cruz-Nava, Cuauhtemoc Florencio-Gutierrez and others
Defendant:
Valentino Lopez, Jr., Gilberto Lopez, Hannah Forrest Farms, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
US v. Jesus Chaidez-Meza
as 20-4522
Defendant / Appellant:
JESUS CHAIDEZ-MEZA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Silverhorn v. Colonial Williamsburg Foundation et al
as 2:2019cv00628
Defendant:
Brenna Lampe, Felicity Meza-Luna, Cheryl Ruschau and others
Plaintiff:
Talon C. Silverhorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
San Jose Restaurant, Inc. v. Laura Pontones
as 19-445
Petitioner:
SAN JOSE OF ROANOKE RAPIDS, INC., SAN JOSE MEXICAN RESAURANT OF ELIZABETHTOWN, INC., EDGAR FLORES and others
Respondent:
LAURA PONTONES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Pontones v. San Jose Restaurant, Incorporated et al
as 5:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Laura Pontones
Defendant:
San Jose Restaurant, Incorporated, San Jose Management, Inc, San Jose Mexican Restaurant #2 of Lumberton, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pontones v. Los Tres Magueyes, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Laura Pontones
Defendant:
Los Tres Magueyes, Inc., Ayotlan, Inc., Tequila, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Zamudio-Meza
as 1:2017cr00089
Defendant:
Ivan Zamudio-Meza
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
