Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Louis M. Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-2193
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor/Defendant:
CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
FRIEDMAN v. HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00533
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRIEDMAN
Defendant:
HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, DAVID W BERSON, BENJAMIN M HOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bushansky v. Hatteras Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv01621
Defendant:
Hatteras Financial Corp., David W. Berson, Benjamin M. Hough and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
WILSON v. HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Defendant:
HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION , DAVID W BERSON , MICHAEL R HOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, BRIAN M. MILLER, EBONY N. WEST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA STOHLER, KAY BRANDON, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
League of Women Voters of NC v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, CHARLES M. GRAY and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Not Yet Classified:
BECKY HURLEY MOCK, LOUIS M. DUKE, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, OCTAVIA RAINEY, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others
Louis Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, NANCY J. LUND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Wren v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02530
Plaintiff:
Patricia Wren
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2015hc02184
Petitioner:
Wren Wilkins
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
