Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Broderick et al v. Capital One Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01454
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hernandez, Kristina Mentone, Mark Miller and others
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), Amazon Web Services, Inc., Capital One Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Patterson v. Ogunba et al
as 8:2019cv00833
Defendant:
Willis, Ice, Akinpetide and others
Plaintiff:
Broderick Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Patterson v. Fredericksburg Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00071
Defendant:
Wayne Hunnicutt, Fredericksburg Police Dept. and K L Stephenson
Plaintiff:
Broderick Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broderick-Ashburn, LLC v. Broderick Acquisition Co., LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01190
Defendant:
McGriff Insurance Services, Inc. and Broderick Acquisition Co., LLC
Plaintiff:
Broderick-Ashburn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. St. Amand et al
as 1:2018cv02061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Deburgo, Brandon Roberts and Patrick Nerette
Defendant:
John./Jane Doe, Carolyn Atkins, Chief Security Frank Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Broderick v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2018hc02131
Petitioner:
Derick Broderick
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McLaurin v. Hardy et al
as 5:2018ct03016
Plaintiff:
Broderick McLaurin
Defendant:
Wendy Hardy, Michael Reed, Steven Averette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
as 2:2017cv02814
Petitioner:
Broderick William Seay, Jr
Respondent:
Al Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. Brown, et al
as 8:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
Broderick Patterson
Defendant:
T. Brown, Ning, Nkwocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
