Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Kelly et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03412
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Bernardo, Scott (I) Coddington, Karen Essendrop and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc., National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. D.O.C./Patuxent Inst. et al
as 8:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Olandus Campbell
Defendant:
D.O.C./Patuxent Inst. and Chong Hong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C. v. Simmons et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Sharon Simmons, Joshua Simmons, Bryan Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Kebede v. CHH Beauty, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02352
Plaintiff:
Fantahun Kebede
Defendant:
CHH Beauty, Inc., Chong Hwang and Kyoung Hwang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chae Brothers, Limited Liability Company et al v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore et al
as 1:2017cv01657
Plaintiff:
Chae Brothers, Limited Liability Company , John Han Chae , Han Bok Chae and others
Defendant:
Mayor & City Council of Baltimore , City of Baltimore , Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chong Yi v. Cable News Network
as 17-1158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHONG SU YI
Defendant - Appellee:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chong Yi v. Abdoulaye Diene
as 17-1048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHONG SU YI
Defendant - Appellee:
ABDOULAYE DIENE and WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INCORPORATED
Armstrong v. Brennon et al
as 1:2016cv01600
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Armstrong
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennon, Tony Chong, Dorothy Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Yi v. Diene et al
as 8:2016cv03653
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Abdoulaye Diene and Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
