Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Locklear et al v. Roberson County Department of Social Services et al
as 7:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Emily Renee Locklear, A. K. Locklear, F.S.J. Locklear and others
Defendant:
Roberson County Department of Social Services, Velvet Nixon, John B. Carter, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilbert Ruffin v. D.M. Christian
as 17-7345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILBERT RUFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
D.M. CHRISTIAN, Police Officer, APONTE, Mr.; Police Officer and BUFFKIN, Mr.; Police Officer
Cornish v. City of Baltimore
as 1:2017cv01304
Plaintiff:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant:
City Of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. Harris et al
as 5:2015ct03174
Plaintiff:
Abrahaman Muhammad
Defendant:
V. K. Harris, D.M. Kornegay, Jeff Tilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cornell Cornish v. Baltimore City
as 15-1709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH
Defendant - Appellee:
BALTIMORE CITY, CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL
McLarney et al v. Haines et al
as 1:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Robert McLarney and Kim McLarney
Defendant:
D.M. Bowman, Inc. and Jason D. Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cornish v. Baltimore City
as 1:2014cv03117
Plaintiff:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant:
Baltimore City, City Council and Mayor and President of the City Council
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hurley v. White et al
as 2:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jefferey Allen Hurley
Defendant:
Mr. White and D.M. Sutton
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
D.M. v. Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
Venitta Johnson and Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Bakkar v. D.M. Bowman Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02401
Plaintiff:
Chambas Bakkar
Defendant:
D.M. Bowman Inc. and Clifton Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
