Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Parker v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27104
Plaintiff:
David Lee Parker
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. David Parker
as 13-7416
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LEE PARKER
Parker v. USA
as 1:2013cv00620
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Lee Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Parker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 1:2012cv03358
Plaintiff:
David L. Parker
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
US v. David Parker
as 12-4886
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID ISAAC PARKER, a/k/a David Green, a/k/a David Smith, a/k/a Jay Smith
Donald Smiley v. David Parker
as 09-2335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD LEON SMILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID STANLEY PARKER, D.O.C., Worldwide Et Al, NATION BANK OF AMERICA and others
Smiley v. Parker et al
as 2:2009cv00551
Plaintiff:
Donald Leon Smiley
Defendant:
David (Stanley) Parker, D.O.C. Worldwide Et Al, Nation Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smiley v. Parker
as 2:2009cv00501
Plaintiff:
Donald Leon Smiley
Defendant:
David Stanley Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Parker v. State of Virginia, et al
as 3:2009cv00425
Plaintiff:
David Clinton Parker
Defendant:
State of Virginia - Dinwiddie Circuit Court and Thomas V. Warren
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1231 (a)(6) Due Process Clause
Parker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 3:2009cv00424
Plaintiff:
David Clinton Parker
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
