Cases 11 - 20 of 135
Toomer v. Tolson et al
as 5:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Shamond Toomer
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John Hicks and Rodney Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Boone v. Tidewater Regional Jail
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Boone
Defendant:
Tidewater Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Tidewater Regional Jail
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Meko Montez Brown, Jr, Kareem J. Hunter, Keishon Robinson and others
Defendant:
Tidewater Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duster et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Duster, Gary Michael Cummings, John Page Cunningham and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
US v. Kentrel Faucette
as 23-4144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENTREL DEANGELO JORDAN FAUCETTE
FAUCETTE v. USA
as 1:2022cv01136
Petitioner:
KENTREL DEANGELO JORDAN FAUCETTE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Rodney Barnes
as 22-4666
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY DEANGELO BARNES
Wright v. Correctional Officer
as 1:2022cv02383
Plaintiff:
Donnie Deangelo Wright
Defendant:
Correctional Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox, Jr. v. The Parole Commission of Maryland and its Agents et al
as 1:2022cv01769
Plaintiff:
Gary Eugene Maddox, Jr.
Defendant:
The Parole Commission of Maryland and its Agents, David R. Blumberg, DeAngelo Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Osborne v. Jane Doe et al
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Osborne
Defendant:
Jane Doe and The Fresh Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
