Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Smith et al v. Chapman et al
as 3:2015mc00094
Plaintiff:
Douglas R. Smith , Mary Luczak-Smith , DRS Family Management, LLC and others
Defendant:
Avery Chapman , Taryn Hartnett and Chapman Legal Group
Counter_defendant:
Douglas R. Smith and DRS Family Holdings LLC
Movant:
Laboratory Equipment Holdings, LLC and Physicians Choice Laboratory Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Reed v. Dalton et al
as 8:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Elliott Martin Reed, I
Defendant:
Carol Dalton, Alfred Irving, Andrea Hartnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hartnett v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17597
Plaintiff:
Lorraine J. Hartnett
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Chapman et al
as 3:2014cv00238
Plaintiff:
Douglas R. Smith, Mary Luczak-Smith, DRS Family Management, LLC and others
Defendant:
Avery Chapman, Taryn Hartnett, Chapman Legal Group doing business as Chapman Law Group, PLLC and others
Petitioner:
Brian Eberhard
Interested Party:
Laboratory Equipment Holdings, LLC and Physicians Choice Laboratory Services, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Chapman Legal Group
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
