Cases 11 - 20 of 19,538
William Gooch v. John Hickenlooper
as 24-1509
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANTHONEY GOOCH
Defendant:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Senator of Colorado, JARED POLIS, Governor of Colorado, PHIL WEISER, Colorado Attorney General and others
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and ACTION NC
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as CHAIR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Jonathan Newell v. Erik Hooks
as 24-6543
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL and TIMOTHY FRANKLIN BALLARD, III
Defendant:
ERIK A. HOOKS, in his individual capacity and EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., in his official capacity
Shepherd v. USA
as 3:2024cv00537
Petitioner:
James Tyrique Shepherd
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Shepherd v. USA
as 3:2024cv00535
Petitioner:
James Tyrique Shepherd
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Stout v. Richie
as 5:2024ct03090
Plaintiff:
James Stout
Defendant:
Sgt. Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Warden of Livesay Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv03331
Plaintiff:
James Henry Thompson, II
Defendant:
The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ABNER, SHANE BOGGS, PATRICK BOWLING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Diana Mey v. William Pintas
as 24-1494
Plaintiff:
DIANA MEY, on behalf of herself and a class of others similarly situated
Defendant:
WILLIAM PINTAS, P&M LAW FIRM, LLC, P&M LAW FIRM (PR), LLC and others
Moore
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Sterling Moore d/b/a Outer Banks Adventures;
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
