Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe No. 48 v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe No. 48
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation , Kmart Holding Corporation , Sears, Roebuck and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hilltop-Copeland Associates, L.P. v. KMART Corporation
as 2:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
Hilltop-Copeland Associates, L.P.
Defendant:
KMART Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JFJ Toys, Inc., d/b/a D&L Company et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 8:2014cv03527
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corporation and Sears Holdings Corporation
Plaintiff:
Fred Ramirez, JFJ Toys, Inc. and JFJ Toys, Inc. doing business as D&L Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Holstein v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv21166
Plaintiff:
Martin V. Holstein
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation , Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Kmart Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kmart Corporation v. Gator Myrtle Beach Partners Ltd
as 4:2013cv02556
Plaintiff:
Kmart Corporation
Defendant:
Gator Myrtle Beach Partners Ltd, Gator Festival LLC, Kings Festival Associates Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Claytor v. Kmart Corporation
as 3:2013cv00561
Plaintiff:
Michael Claytor
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watson v. Kmart Corporation
as 7:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
Tyron Watson
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
