Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25923
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22503
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith and Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv13537
Plaintiff:
Tina Barnes , Shirley Pulda , Katherine Nelson and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv05518
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith and Donnie Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pratt v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith Pratt
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Analytic Biosurgical Solutions et al
as 2:2012cv09288
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith
Defendant:
Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, Mentor Worldwide LLC, Coloplast A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Quelet v. Preston et al
as 1:2012cv01876
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey John Quelet
Defendant:
Vernon Preston, Lisa Smith, Stephen Pfisterer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00269
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clinton Ivey v. Garrett Shelton, Jr.
as 10-6690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON MATTHEW IVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GARRETT SHELTON, JR., Captain (Portsmouth Police), LISA SMITH, Lieutenant (Portsmouth Police), CARLOS GONZALEZ, Detective (Suffolk) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
