Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
M.R., Jr. et al v. Roanoke County School Board
as 7:2012cv00295
Plaintiff: M.R., Jr., M.R.,Sr. and S.R.
Defendant: Roanoke County School Board
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Michel Dukes v. Detective M.R. Richards We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-7711
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHEL ANDRE DUKES
Defendant - Appellee: DETECTIVE M.R. RICHARDS
Paull Anderson v. Frank Godley
as 08-1520
Plaintiff - Appellee: PAULL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellant: FRANK H. GODLEY
Defendant - None: JULIUS JENNINGS WADE, JR., d/b/a Wade & Wade, Attorneys at Law, Individually, JAMES H. WADE, d/b/a Wade & Wade, Attorneys at Law, Individually, WADE & WADE, ATTORNEYS AT LAW and others
Paull Anderson v. Julius Wade, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAULL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee: JULIUS JENNINGS WADE, JR., d/b/a Wade & Wade, Attorneys at Law, Individually, JAMES H. WADE, d/b/a Wade & Wade, Attorneys at Law, Individually, WADE & WADE, ATTORNEYS AT LAW and others
Defendant - None: JOHNNY C. GODLEY, Executor of the Estate of Margaret L. Godley, FRANK H. GODLEY, JAMES GODLEY and others
Williams v. Black et al
as 5:2007ct03170
Plaintiff: Lacy Lee Williams
Defendant: J.C. Black, C.D. Weir, M.R. Sheriam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
P.I. & I. Motor Express, Inc. v. M.R. Stone, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2007cv02629
Plaintiff: P.I. & I. Motor Express, Inc.
Defendant: M.R. Stone, L.L.C. and Audra Martenot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Benzo et al v. M.R. Stone, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2007cv01937
Plaintiff: William Benzo and Steven C. Benzo
Defendant: M.R. Stone, L.L.C. and Audra Martenot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?