Cases 11 - 20 of 190
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. South Carolina Dept of Corr Cooperation et al
as 0:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corr. Corporation, Kershaw Corr. Inst., Warden James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Newkirk v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Warden Artrip, Investigator Harris, Assistant Warden Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuffie v. Baker et al
as 5:2024ct03042
Plaintiff:
Prentis McDuffie
Defendant:
Matthew Baker and Russell Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byington v. McDuffie
as 7:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Byington
Defendant:
Dr. McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. McDuffy
as 7:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
McDuffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Cooper v. McDuffy
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
McDuffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagan v. Delosh et al
as 2:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Demetrius J. Hagan
Defendant:
Penny L. Delosh, Mary McDuffie and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
