Cases 11 - 18 of 18
MARSHALL v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARSHALL
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SNIDER v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2009cv00961
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
LONNIE SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
DAVIS et al v. A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv00627
Plaintiff:
JACKSON WAYNE DAVIS and DORIS GREEN DAVIS
Defendant:
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALFA LAVAL, INC., AURORA PUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Carolina Power & Light Company v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2009cv00190
Defendant:
The Holladay Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company, Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolina Power & Light Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv03621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PPG Industries, Inc. v. AT Associates, LLP et al
as 2:2008cv00362
Plaintiff:
PPG Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Beach Ford, Inc., AT Associates, LLP and Barton Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PPG Industries, Inc. v. International Chemical Workers Union Council of the United Food and Commericial Workers et al
as 5:2007cv00085
Plaintiff:
PPG Industries, Inc. and PPG Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
International Chemical Workers Union Council of the United Food and Commericial Workers and International Chemical Workers Council of the United Food and Commerical Workers, Local Union No. 45C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
USA v. Agere Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
United States Of America, United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
Agere, Inc., Alcolac, Inc., Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
