Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Arthur Davis, III v. Debra Davis
as 21-1667
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. DAVIS, an Individual and sibling of Plaintiff and is a resident of North Carolina, DEBRA K. DAVIS, an Individual and sibling of Plaintiff and is a resident of North Carolina, KARLA L. NELSON, an Individual and sibling of Plaintiff and is a resident of Minnesota and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR E. DAVIS, III
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
McCloud v. Davis, et al
as 4:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael McCloud
Defendant:
D.B. Frye, Jr. and Thomas R. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Davis v. Davis et al
as 5:2020cv00609
Defendant:
Pamela J. Rock, Joseph R. Davis, Karla L. Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur E. Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. TriToon 306 et al
as 4:2019cv02808
Defendant:
Denver Ray Davis, TriToon 306, Denver R Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hall v. Davis et al
as 3:2019cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Hall
Defendant:
Mr. Dudley, Mrs. Kitchens and Mr. R. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Jacquez v. City of Clarksburg
as 19-1023
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSBURG, a municipal corporation and political subdivision, MARTIN G. HOWE, H. KEITH KESLING and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA R. JACQUEZ, wife and THOMAS HERBERT FLUHARTY, in his official capacity as Bankruptcy Trustee
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS J. JACQUEZ, husband
Davis v. Fluor Enterprises Inc.
as 0:2018cv01597
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Davis
Defendant:
Fluor Enterprises Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
