Cases 11 - 20 of 193
Williams et al v. Colclough et al
as 6:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hunt Williams and April Garner
Defendant:
Terrance Colclough, Lhoman Mays, Nelson Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. Terrence Wilson
as 21-7639
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRENCE ROSARIO WILSON
Rosario et al v. MAL Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jessa Hinton, Kim Cozzens, Hillary hepner and others
Defendant:
MAL Entertainment, Inc., BLL Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Crazy Horse, David Baucom and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Geiger et al v. Ambis 1 Night Club Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00415
Plaintiff:
Brenda Geiger, Camila Davalos, Carissa Rosario and others
Defendant:
Ambis 1 Night Club Inc., Ronnie Woodall and Ambis 1 Night Club Inc. d/b/a Ambis 1 Night Club
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Rosario-Castro v. Commonwealth of Virgina
as 2:2021cv00523
Petitioner:
Alberto Rosario-Castro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virgina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Builders Transportation Co. et al
as 1:2021cv01948
Plaintiff:
CARLOS E. ROSARIO
Defendant:
BUILDERS TRANSPORTATION CO. and RASHIME OMAR GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heriot v. Safrit et al
as 3:2021cv02217
Plaintiff:
Jerel Marquis Heriot
Defendant:
Anthony Lee Safrit, Tre Thompson, Nelson Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pacheco v. Streeval
as 7:2021cv00389
Respondent:
J. C. Streeval
Petitioner:
Misael Rosario Pacheco, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosario Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 8:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jose A Rosario Rodriguez and Jose A Rosario Rodriguez
Defendant:
Navy Dept. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
