Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2018cv00557
Defendant:
R. Walz, C. Cline, Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv09005
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Yates and Melvin E. Yates
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yates v. Westervelt et al
as 8:2015cv03090
Plaintiff:
JoAnn S Yates
Defendant:
Laurence Westervelt and T & L Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porfiro Barnes v. S. K. Young
as 13-7774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PORFIRO R. BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN S. K. YOUNG, A. W. MEEK, Asst Warden, E. J. EATON, Unit Manager/Bldg A-1 and others
Bane v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Bane
Defendant:
T. Batton, Dr. Cacciopo, A. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Young et al
as 7:2012cv00067
Plaintiff:
Porfiro R. Barnes
Defendant:
E. J. Eaton, Jerald Hopkins, A. W. Meek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Young et al
as 1:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
Porfiro R. Barnes
Defendant:
S. K. Young, A. W. Meek, E. J. Eaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Pocahontas Correctional Center et al
as 7:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Armand A. Clark
Defendant:
A. Mitchell, Pocahontas Correctional Center and S. Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Pocahontas Correctional Center et al
as 2:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Armand A. Clark
Defendant:
Pocahontas Correctional Center, S. Yates and A. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gwyn v. Yates et al
as 7:2010cv00314
Health Services Dir:
John Doe
Defendant:
John Garmen
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Gwyn, Jr.
Grievance Coordinator:
Hasty Martin
Rncb:
S. Yates
Warden:
S. K. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
