Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 441
Tate v. Langdon, III
as 1:2024cv00771
Petitioner: Antonio Emerson Tate
Respondent: William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff: Danielle Tate
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
McKinnon v. MCCF Director et al
as 1:2024cv00289
Plaintiff: Willie Orlando McKinnon
Defendant: MCCF Director, Warden Fredrick Abello, Deputy Warden Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00035
Petitioner: Reginald Daushawn Earl Tate
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Massey v. Hendley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00361
Plaintiff: Quamaine Lee Massey and Quamaine Massey
Defendant: FNU Hendley, Kizer Jr Morgon, FNU Stancil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03358
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 jb Job Discrimination (Race)
Tate v. Davis et al
as 9:2023cv06417
Plaintiff: Ricky Dean Tate
Defendant: Director Willie Davis, Mr. Anderson, Warden Johnny Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tate v. Anderson et al
as 9:2023cv05109
Plaintiff: Ricky Dean Tate
Defendant: Noel Anderson, Willie Davis, Ms. Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2023cv02754
Plaintiff: Richard C Washington
Defendant: T Wolfe, Stephawn Tate, Matthew Lipscomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Tajuan Tate
as 23-6976
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: TAJUAN MONTRE TATE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?