Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Rochester v. Clerk et al
as 6:2020cv04249
Defendant:
Oconee County Magistrate Judges, Beth Drake, United States Marshal's Service and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar et al v. Fields et al
as 7:2020cv00195
Plaintiff:
J C-H, Ms. Luz Huerta Salazar, Mr. Jose F Toribio and others
Defendant:
Mr. James Russell Fields, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Hugue v. Harvat et al
as 9:2020cv01963
Defendant:
Michael Harvat and United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Maranda Hugue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
FAULKNER v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2019cv01096
Petitioner:
ALVIN FAULKNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Meyers v. Roanoke U.S. Attorney
as 19-7363
Respondent / Appellee:
ROANOKE UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE, THOMAS T. CULLEN, U.S. Attorney, FBI, Richmond & Roanoke Field Office and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Stuart v. Jones et al
as 5:2019ct03268
Defendant:
Robert Jones, United States Marshals Service and Officer Griffin
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Stuart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00573
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Casillas-Prieto v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2019cv00148
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Casillas-Prieto
Defendant:
Fannin County Texas, United States Marshal Service and The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Cabiness v. United States Marshal Service
as 7:2019cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kenya Jamel Cabiness
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyer v. Burreal et al
as 5:2018ct03252
Defendant:
Stephanie Hollemback, Amy Bullock, Unnamed Federal Bureau of Prisons employees and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
