Cases 21 - 30 of 816
Wyatt v. Holmes
as 3:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Wyatt
Defendant:
Officer Trevor Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Michael Moment v. Ahmed Rahimi
as 23-2292
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOMENT
Defendant:
AHMED RAHIMI, EVANS FOMUNYOH, CITY OF TAKOMA PARK and others
Holmes v. USA
as 2:2023cv06715
Petitioner:
Edmund Dechane Holmes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Baker et al v. Corteva, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv01666
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS DOWDUPONT, INC., EIDP, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, CORTEVA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE BAKER, BRYAN BARKLEY, MICHAEL BURRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
US v. Tysha Holmes
as 23-4700
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYSHA S. HOLMES
Folk v. Palmer et al
as 9:2023cv05737
Plaintiff:
Courtney Folk
Defendant:
Sgt. Joyce Palmer, Lieutenant Daniel Riveta, Associate Warden Ann Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derrica Holmes v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05389
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Derrica Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Holmes, III et al
as 2:2023cv05321
Plaintiff:
Damien Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
William Harrison Holmes, III and Duane Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Williams
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Larry Leabough, Dennis Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Lassiter v. ECI
as 23-7014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON LASSITER
Defendant / Appellee:
EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, a/k/a ECI, LT. JASON DERR, WARDEN WALTER WEST and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
