Cases 21 - 30 of 184
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SILVA v. SWIFT
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT and TAYLOR SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
SILVA v. SWIFT
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVA v. SWIFT et al
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT and NASHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVA v. SWIFT
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bentz et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2022cv00016
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., Shandong Taihe Dongxin Co. Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bentz, Scott Spires, James Blankenship and others
Broto et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 0:2021cv04136
Plaintiff:
Ana Paula Godoi Silva Broto, Gustavo Machado De Lima Faria and WQS Food Verification LLC
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Gregory Richardson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Virga v. Bernardino da Silva Neto et al
as 1:2021cv03213
Plaintiff:
Madeline Noel Virga
Defendant:
GREGORIO BERNARDINO DA SILVA NETO, ZUKHURIDDIN KHAMIDOV and TURO INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Henry Portillo Silva v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2388
Petitioner:
HENRY F. PORTILLO SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General and JANEAN OHIN, Acting Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
