Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Lewis et al v. Ethicon Women's Health and Urology et al
as 2:2014cv14708
Plaintiff:
Christina Lewis and James G. B. Lewis
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology , Ethicon Inc. , Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frierson v. Hazel et al
as 5:2013cv02530
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Frierson
Defendant:
Ms Hazel, C Hamilton, Mr Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kathy Stratton v. Mecklenburg County
as 13-1095
Plaintiff:
JACK STRATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, RICHARD JACOBSEN, TYRONE WADE and others
Movant - Appellant:
KATHY STRATTON, on behalf of the Estate of Jack Stratton, plaintiff
Irvin Jefferson Wilson v. William Byra
as 13-6083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRVIN JEFFERSON WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYRAS, Director SCDC, MONICA WALLACE, Classification SCDC and B. LEWIS, Case Worker SCDC
Defendant:
C. THOMPSON, Grievanor Co-Ord SCDC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Lewis et al
as 0:2012cv01627
Plaintiff:
Jerome McFadden
Defendant:
S B Lewis, Frank Mursier and L Carteledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kathy Stratton v. Mecklenburg County
as 12-1625
Plaintiff:
JACK STRATTON
Movant - Appellant:
KATHY STRATTON, on behalf of the Estate of Jack Stratton, plaintiff
Defendant - Appellee:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, RICHARD JACOBSEN, TYRONE WADE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
