Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00095
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Sampson v. Ozmint et al
as 9:2009cv03273
Plaintiff:
Tashon Sampson
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Ronnie Cribb, Andy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration and Naturalization Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00480
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. White
as 1:2009cv00984
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, C. James Lowthers, George Anderson and others
Defendant:
Steven C. White
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MAULTSBY v. JAMES
as 1:2009cv00250
Plaintiff:
CHATAN MAULTSBY
Defendant:
WAYNE C. JAMES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Livingston v. Oberman et al
as 8:2008cv03064
Plaintiff:
Jared Livingston
Defendant:
A J Padula, Bruce Oberman, C James and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mickell v. Ozmint et al
as 3:2008cv02973
Plaintiff:
Darrell J Mickell
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, James Sligh, Jr, Anthony Padula and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. Patterson et al
as 0:2008cv02199
Plaintiff:
John E Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Sharon Patterson, C James, NFN Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
