Cases 21 - 30 of 3,428
Walters v. Medical Staff RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Russell Odell Walters
Defendant:
Medical Staff RRJ, Security Staffing RRJ and Dr. Ronald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Coates v. Lt. Keistler et al
as 1:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Alkein Coates
Defendant:
Lt. Keistler, Tyler, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LLT Management LLC v. Emory et al
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
LLT Management LLC
Defendant:
Dr. Theresa Swain Emory, Dr. Richard Lawrence Kradin and Dr. John Coulter Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
David McLester v. Lindsey DeGuehery
as 24-6446
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN MCLESTER
Defendant:
DR. LINDSEY DEGUEHERY and NURSE R. JONES
Aurel v. Jessup Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Jessup Correctional Institution, Dr. Khalid El-Bedavei, MD, Dr. Muleta Obsu, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Begeny v. The Helps Education Fund, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Dr. John Begeny
Defendant:
The Helps Education Fund, Inc., William Gibson and Erin Banks
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hodge v. Cook
as 5:2024ct03104
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
